Fraser, N. And says Locke: …if he would give his nuts for a piece of metal, pleased with its color, or exchange his sheep for shells, or wool for a sparkling pebble or diamond, and keep those by him all his life, he invaded not Locke would turn to gay social and right of others, he might heap up as much of these durable things as he pleased; the exceeding of the bounds of his property not lying in the largeness of his possessions, but the perishing of anything uselessly in it.
So, for Locke, legitimate government is instituted by the explicit consent of those governed. He claims that there are no fixed boundaries in nature to be discovered—that is there are no clear demarcation points between species.
These include mathematical and moral ideas, and all the conventional language of religion, politics and culture. It is in this sense that Locke means that reason reveals the law. Two types of rights theoretically distinct according to philosophers and political scientists.
Neither of these strategies made much progress during the course of the Restoration. Once again it is labor which imposes limitations upon how much land can be enclosed. Among the issues are which qualities Locke assigns to each of the two categories. But he adds:.
All things considered were equal, e. Locke believes that using reason to try to grasp the truth, and determine the legitimate functions of institutions will optimize human flourishing for the individual and society both in respect to its material and spiritual welfare.
Reprinted in Tipton — South Bend, Ind. Unalienable Rights are essential Limitations in all Governments. Treatises II, 1, 4.